- 27 Apr 2022
- 2 Minutes to read
- Print
- PDF
Evolution of a Scoring Method
- Updated on 27 Apr 2022
- 2 Minutes to read
- Print
- PDF
Legends
Colour | Meaning | Display |
Green | An increase/added from the previous year | π’ |
Yellow | Same as the previous year | π‘ |
Red | A decrease/removed from the previous year | π΄ |
Blue | New | π΅ |
Measurement area + Weightage + Change in indicators
2021
Measurement Areas | Number of indicators | Weightage | ||
Governance and strategy | 3 | π΄ | 10% | π‘ |
Genetic resources and intellectual property management π΅ | 6 | π΅ | 15% | π΅ |
Research and development | 6 | π΄ | 20% | π’ |
Seed production | 4 | π΄ | 15% | π’ |
Marketing and sales | 8 | π΄ | 25% | π’ |
Capacity building | 5 | π΄ | 15% | π΄ |
2019
Measurement Areas | Number of indicators | Weightage | ||
Governance and strategy | 9 | π’ | 10% | π‘ |
Genetic resources | 7 | π΅ | 10% | π΅ |
Intellectual property | 7 | π΅ | 10% | π΅ |
Research and development | 10 | π’ | 20% | π‘ |
Seed production | 7 | π’ | 10% | π‘ |
Marketing and Sales | 11 | π’ | 20% | π‘ |
Capacity building | 8 | π’ | 20% | π‘ |
2016
Measurement Areas | Number of indicators | Weightage | ||
Governance and strategy | 3 | π΅ | 10% | π΅ |
Public Policy & Stakeholder Engagement | 3 | π΅ | 10% | π΅ |
Genetic resources & Intellectual property | 3 | π΅ | 20% | π΅ |
Research and development | 3 | π΅ | 20% | π΅ |
Marketing and sales | 5 | π΅ | 20% | π΅ |
Capacity building | 3 | π΅ | 10% | π΅ |
Local Seed Sector Advancement | 5 | π΅ | 10% | π΅ |
Categories of indicators
There are 4 categories of indicators in each measurement area. Below mentioned is an image from 2019.
- Commitment indicators evaluate whether companies have policies, targets and codes of conduct in place that guide their activities.
- Performance indicators evaluate actual practices, programs and activities the company has implemented.
- Transparency indicators evaluate whether companies publicly report on their policies and practices.
- Leadership indicators reward activities or approaches that stand out or can be an example for other companies.
2021
2019
Categories of indicators | Weightage | |
Commitment | 20% | π΄ |
Performance | 60% | π’ |
Transparency | 10% | π΄ |
Leadership | 10% | π΅ |
2016
Categories of indicators | Weightage | |
Commitment | 25% | π΅ |
Performance | 50% | π΅ |
Transparency | 15% | π΅ |
Innovation | 10% | π΅ |
Scoring
2021 | 2019 | 2016 |
Scoring takes place at the indicator level. The index will typically use a three-point scale with one point increments of 0, 1 and 2; or a five-point scale of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2. In each case, 2 is the highest score, 1 is the midpoint and 0 is the lowest. The increments are linear and equal. Each indicator is scored against a set of predefined criteria related to the elements outlined in the indicators section below. The elements for each indicator reflect what is expected of the company and what it will be assessed and scored on. | The company was scored using a five-point scale. Both at measurement area and indicator categories. How the company rankings work per measurement area? | A companyβs overall score is the weighted sum of its scores on all indicators. |
Indicators
Measurement Area | Indicators (Only from 2021) | 2021 | 2019 | 2016 |
TOTAL | 32 | 59 | 25 | |
Governance and strategy | ||||
Access to seeds for smallholder farmers | π‘ | π‘ | π΅ | |
Governance and accountability | π‘ | π‘ | π΅ | |
Stakeholder engagement | π΅ | - | - | |
Genetic resources and intellectual property management | ||||
Conservation of genetic resources | π‘ | π‘ | π΅ | |
Access to company genetic resources | π‘ | π‘ | π΅ | |
Benefit-sharing | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Breedersβ exemption | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Farmersβ privilege | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Licensing | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Research and development | ||||
Plant breeding activities in index regions | π’ | π΅ | - | |
Local participation in breeding/variety development | π’ | π’ | π΅ | |
Variety testing | π’ | π’ | π΅ | |
Developing improved varieties of global crops | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Developing improved varieties of local crops | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Breeding programme for specific traits | π΅ | - | - | |
Seed production | ||||
Seed production activities in index region | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Engaging smallholder farmers in seed production | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Quality management in seed production in index countries | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Social and labour rights in seed production | π΅ | - | - | |
Marketing and sales | ||||
Quality and safety of varieties | π‘ | π‘ | π΅ | |
Distribution channels | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Diverse portfolio | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Packaging and labelling | π‘ | π’ | π΅ | |
Affordability | π‘ | π’ | π΅ | |
Quality assurance and after-sales | π‘ | π’ | π΅ | |
Demonstration and promotion strategies | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Other agricultural inputs | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Capacity building | ||||
Extension services | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Programmes for women farmers | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Next-generation farmers | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Information and communications technology (ICT) | π‘ | π΅ | - | |
Access to output markets | π‘ | π‘ | π΅ |
If you are a leader and are interested in joining our community. Join our LinkedIn Group Sustainability Research & Analysis Community
References:
2019 - https://www.accesstoseeds.org/app/uploads/2018/03/Methodology-for-the-Access-to-Seeds-Index-2019.pdf (Scoring)
Company Scores https://www.accesstoseeds.org/app/uploads/2019/01/How-the-company-scores-and-rankings-work.pdf
Methodology - https://www.accesstoseeds.org/methodology/
2016 - https://www.accesstoseeds.org/app/uploads/2016/08/Access-to-Seeds-Index-2016-online.pdf
2015 - https://www.accesstoseeds.org/app/uploads/2015/12/Methodology-Report-2014.pdf https://www.accesstoseeds.org/app/uploads/2015/08/Methodology-Report-for-the-Access-to-Seeds-Index-2015.pdf